Post by Wayne Rayner on Mar 23, 2009 10:54:09 GMT 10
I had 2005 for pc until it didn't work. It has fairly good graphics and a fairly good gameplay. I then found a disk lying in my bedroom recently and it turned out to be cricket 2004 and it worked and it has not as good graphics as 2005 but the gameplay is absolutly phenomenal. It is more realistick than 2005 more misfields, better appeals, injuries (not even seen in 2005) and even a good fun cricket game where it is more better to play than the game that they followed up on. I think EA was focusing on the graphics more than the gameplay. Cricket games need the gameplay more than the graphics.
Wayne Rayner
Admin
Wayne Rayner
Admin